Mapping the routes of research on the architecture, but since this projective devices, suggests a search field and even provocation to the status quo - permanently moments of discipline warned to uncritically reproduce themselves over the basis of stereotyped patterns. Traditions proyectuales
installed in different cultural formations, but as a dynamic virtualized mobile information is changing strategies, techniques and operational models.
critical appraisal criteria, historical perspectivism and the same construction of architectural knowledge are moving quickly after the persecution of its own consistency epochal.
We have treated the pro-neismos at the time sponsored by the magazine and also Quaderns the vitality with which new claims a distinct Latin American architecture hermeneutics of local currencies.
Our imaginary have changed and the way of being in the world. No child is an indication that the naming epistemological breaks record things that put us face realities defined by a kind of new fuzzy edge contractualism social.Marco rather vague and blurred from which the outer ends of the architecture and as internal clogged, articulate or frictional visibilities proliferations of meaning which we pose the generalized crisis of the inclusion of the discipline in the real.
The spectacular backdrop of the architecture of financial bubbles, in sharp decline poses a reprimand where the effects of agenda for the next decade are so problematic and complex.
As distinct and substantive adjectives, architectures diagrámticas, performative, liquid, or parameters have installed some kind of debate more focused on methodological issues that epistemological dimensions.
blotted the memory of the speculations of Christopher Jones, Geoffrey Broadbent, Guy Bonsieppe or upgrading from Christopher Alexander modalities invested in a series of new rationales and a burst of neos that delineate a landscape that looks derives its concept but a reality nomadica multidimensional.
-Jorge Mele